Kimberly M. Donaldson

Profile

Phone: 
610-645-4708
Office: 
361 West Lancaster Avenue, Haverford, PA 19041 Phone: 610-642-8500

KIMBERLY M. DONALDSON is a Partner in the Firm's Haverford office. Ms. Donaldson concentrates her practice on the prosecution of securities fraud class action litigation, shareholder derivative actions and breach of fiduciary duty class action lawsuits. She is also a member of the Firm's Client Development Group and works closely with the Firm's institutional clients.

Ms. Donaldson is a 1999 cum laude graduate of Villanova University School of Law and is a 1996 graduate of Boston University, where she received a B.A. in Political Science, and interned with the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General, Public Protection Bureau. Ms. Donaldson is admitted to practice before the Supreme Courts of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and various Federal Appellate and District Courts. Ms. Donaldson's pro bono activities include serving as a volunteer attorney with the Support Center for Child Advocates, a Philadelphia-based, nonprofit organization that provides legal and social services to abused and neglected children.

In 2006, Law & Politics and the publishers of Philadelphia Magazine included Ms. Donaldson as a Pennsylvania Rising Star, as listed in the "Pennsylvania Rising Stars Super Lawyers" publication. Only 2.5 percent of the total lawyers in Pennsylvania are listed in Rising Stars.

Also, together with the Firm's other Partners, Ms. Donaldson has assisted, or is currently assisting, in the prosecution of several federal securities fraud cases, breach of fiduciary duty suits and corporate derivative actions, including the following:

  • Wells Real Estate Investment Trust Inc. (Wells REIT), Case No. 07-cv-637 (USDC D.MD.), The Firm filed this class action in 2007 asserting federal securities law claims under the 1933 Securities Act involving a $4.0 Billion real estate investment trust whose stock is not listed on a national stock exchange. This pending action alleges that the Company and its officers and directors violated the federal securities laws and breached their fiduciary duties by entering into and presenting for a vote by Wells REIT shareholders a Merger between Wells REIT and its affiliate whereby the affiliates would improperly receive $175 million worth of consideration.
  • CNL Hotels & Resorts Inc. Federal Securities Litigation, Case No. 04-cv-1231 (M.D. Fla.). The Firm is lead trial counsel in this settled action filed in 2004 asserting federal securities law claims under the 1933 Securities Act involving a $3.0 Billion real estate investment trust whose stock is not listed on a national stock exchange. The Litigation was settled by: (1) the establishment of a $35,000,000 Cash Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Purchaser Class; and, (2) by CNL entering into revised agreements in connection with a proposed Merger between CNL and its affiliate which Plaintiffs estimate reduced the amount to have been paid by CNL and its stockholders in connection with the merger by over $225 Million. On August 1, 2006, the Federal District Court in Orlando, Florida granted final approval of the Settlement of the CNL Litigation, noting that "Plaintiffs’ counsel pursued this complex case diligently, competently and professionally" and "achieved a successful result." The Court also concluded that, "a substantial benefit [was] achieved (estimated at approximately $225,000,000)" and "this lawsuit was clearly instrumental in achieving that result."
  • In re Real Estate Associates Limited Partnerships Litigation, No. CV 98-7035 DDP (CD. Cal.). The Firm was Lead Trial Counsel in this class action asserting federal securities law claims and claims for state law breaches of fiduciary duty. As the principal trial assistant to Mr. Chimicles, Ms. Donaldson was an integral member of the trial team that obtained the first plaintiffs' jury verdict in a federal securities fraud/breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit tried to a jury in the past ten years. The total verdict of $185 million (including $92.5 million in punitive damages) was among the “Top 10” Verdicts of 2002 and stands as the first and largest jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs in a case brought under the federal securities laws since their amendment in 1995. The Real Estate Associates judgment was settled by an agreement approved by the Court in November 2003 for $83 million, which represented full recovery for the Class (and an amount in excess of the damages calculated by Plaintiffs’ expert). Please refer to Mr. Chimicles’ bio for additional information.
  • In re Discovery Laboratories Securities Litigation, No. 06-1820 (E.D. Pa). The Firm is Lead Counsel in this pending securities class action brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased common stock of Discovery Labs during the class period. Discovery Labs is a development stage biotechnology company, which is focused upon proprietary surfactant technology.
  • Lewis, et al. v. CNL Income Funds, et al, District Court of Dallas County, Texas. The Firm is co-lead counsel in this pending action filed in 2005 on behalf of limited partners in 18 Florida limited partnerships who were requested to approve a $1.6 Billion three-way merger involving their limited partnerships. Among other things, the Complaint alleges that the General Partners breached their fiduciary duties by approving a Merger that provided the Limited Partners with inadequate consideration, and by disseminating a misleading Proxy on which the Limited Partners were asked to cast their vote on the Merger.
  • Pennexx Securities Litigation, No. 2:03-CV-4318 (E.D. Pa.) The Firm is co-lead counsel in this pending securities fraud class action lawsuit filed in 2003 on behalf of public investors in Pennexx Foods, Inc. ("Pennexx"). Certain of the District Court's rulings on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are currently being appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Together with the Firm's other Partners, Ms. Donaldson has also assisted in the prosecution of actions involving health and welfare issues, including actions to recover excessive charges due to fraud and other misconduct by health service providers, and antitrust claims to recover excessive prescription drug charges and other costs due to corporate collusion and misconduct.